Most investors know they’re paying something for advice. Fewer can say exactly how much. Even fewer have modelled the long-term impact of those fees—and what they might be costing in opportunity, compounding, or flexibility.
It’s not about whether independent financial advice is worth paying for. In most cases, it absolutely is. But in the UK, too many clients are paying ongoing fees that are entirely disconnected from the value they’re receiving. A 1% annual fee on a £1 million portfolio equates to £10,000 a year. That could be a reasonable price—or an expensive mistake. It all depends on what you're getting in return.
What complicates things is that adviser costs are rarely evaluated with the same scrutiny as investment performance. Most business owners wouldn’t tolerate vague invoices or misaligned incentive structures from a contractor, lawyer, or consultant. Yet many accept exactly that from their adviser—often for decades.
The real question isn’t “are adviser fees too high?” It’s am I getting measurable, compounding value that justifies every pound I’m paying?
Most investors focus too much on the number and not enough on the result. A 1% annual fee might sound steep. A flat fee of £3,000 per year might seem excessive. But without context, those figures mean nothing. The real question isn’t how much does my adviser cost? — it’s what am I actually getting for it?
A well-structured fee is not inherently a problem. If your adviser is protecting you from costly mistakes, guiding you through market volatility, securing efficient tax outcomes, or tailoring your retirement planning to the specifics of your future income needs, their fee could easily pay for itself several times over.
The real danger lies in misalignment. That’s when you’re paying high fees for low-value input. Or worse, paying recurring charges for advice you no longer need—or never really needed in the first place.
Here’s where it gets complicated: bad value doesn’t always look like bad service. You might be receiving regular reviews, glossy reports, and polite conversation. But unless those meetings lead to actionable decisions that measurably improve your position—more tax saved, better drawdown strategies, sharper investment allocations—then the adviser is simply being pleasant, not useful.
This is especially important in the UK context, where many advisers still default to outdated percentage-based fee models tied to assets under management. For passive investors with diversified portfolios and minimal trading, that model can quickly become unjustifiable. You shouldn’t be paying a percentage-based fee for a portfolio that hasn’t changed in three years.
One of the most misunderstood aspects of adviser fees is that they don’t just reduce your returns once. They reduce what you’re able to reinvest, year after year. And over time, that has a snowball effect that can seriously undermine your long-term financial trajectory.
Let’s say you’re paying a 1% annual fee on a £750,000 portfolio. That’s £7,500 per year. Not pocket change—but not outrageous either.
Now project that forward 20 years. If your portfolio averages 6% annual growth, but you lose 1% of that to fees, your effective return drops to 5%. On paper, that might seem fine. But here’s the difference it makes:
That’s nearly £420,000 lost, not to poor performance—but to silent, steady compounding of adviser fees. And this doesn’t even include platform charges, fund fees, or transaction costs.
Most investors don’t feel this cost in real time. That’s what makes it dangerous. It’s not like a bad stock pick that crashes overnight. Fee drag accumulates quietly. And unless you’re tracking the impact annually and comparing adviser value to alternatives, it’s easy to miss.
Business owners are particularly vulnerable. Why? Because their adviser often ends up managing cash from a business sale or pension transfer—high-value, low-activity portfolios where percentage-based fees can quietly erode wealth without providing ongoing strategic input.
If your adviser has placed you in a low-cost, buy-and-hold investment strategy (say, global index funds or multi-asset portfolios), and nothing significant has changed in your portfolio for several years, ask yourself this:
The most common answer is inertia. But the more expensive answer is lost compound growth.
It’s easy to critique fees—but harder to quantify value. So let’s flip the conversation: when is an adviser worth what they charge? What does genuine, high-impact financial advice actually look like? It’s not about market predictions or fancy charts. It’s about real decisions, with real consequences, made better by having the right person at the table.
A good adviser won’t just recommend an ISA or pension contribution—they’ll help you optimise the timing, structure, and limits of your contributions based on your broader financial picture.
Even a single well-timed recommendation here can save thousands. And this is where many independent financial advisers shine—they’re not tied to a limited range of products and can build tax-aware strategies tailored to your full financial life.
During market downturns, the real value of advice isn’t portfolio selection—it’s stopping you from making emotional decisions. Selling at the bottom, chasing performance, or switching to cash at the wrong moment are all common, costly mistakes.
A strong adviser keeps you grounded, not by being reactive, but by building conviction in your plan before things get rough. That confidence is what prevents panic and ensures you stay on course.
For those with complex wealth—especially business owners approaching sale or succession—good advice can unlock six- or seven-figure improvements in outcomes.
These aren’t generic planning needs. They’re situational, strategic, and deeply personal. And they often go untouched in low-cost, volume-based advice models.
One of the simplest signs of adviser value? Proactivity. Are they coming to you with insights, opportunities, and risks before you ask? Or are you chasing them for basic updates?
A proactive adviser earns their keep by staying ahead of change—market, regulatory, or personal. If your adviser only reacts when you reach out, you’re not paying for strategy. You’re paying for admin.
Not all fee models are created equal. The problem isn’t the structure—it’s using the wrong structure for your situation. A fee that’s perfectly fair for one investor could be wildly inappropriate for another, simply because the underlying needs are different.
Let’s break it down.
How it works: You pay a fixed percentage of your portfolio value each year—typically between 0.5% and 1%. If your portfolio grows, the adviser’s fee increases accordingly.
When it works:
When it doesn’t:
How it works: You pay a set fee monthly or annually, regardless of portfolio size. This could range from a few hundred to several thousand pounds per year, depending on complexity.
How it works: You pay by the hour or for a defined scope of work—such as building a financial plan, advising on pension drawdown, or helping with a one-off inheritance issue.
When you’re managing significant assets or preparing for long-term financial milestones, the way you pay for advice matters. Poorly structured fees can quietly reduce returns and limit the effectiveness of even sound planning.
Strong financial outcomes rely on clear thinking and careful execution. That includes understanding what you’re paying for, why it’s charged that way, and whether the value holds up over time.
A transparent, well-aligned fee model supports better decisions. It makes it easier to measure results, hold your adviser accountable, and ensure the advice you’re receiving genuinely supports your goals—not just the adviser's revenue.
Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
Your nickname:
Email address:
Subscribe
Request AppointmentGet StartedWhatsapp Chat
Note: This page is for information purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. Always consult an Independent Financial Adviser for personalised financial advice tailored to your individual circumstances.